Friday, March 20, 2009

Which of these are too insulting?

Having joined the #badgeofhonor list of twits blocked by Jake Tapper, I invite both my readers to ascertain which of my posts was sufficiently bile-laden to justify such treatment:

phd9: @jaketapper The 'insult' threshhold will always be lower to the recipient than the provider.

phd9: @jaketapper The Leno transcript has 4430 words and yet you have nothing to report on but two of them - mumbled at that. Agenda much?

phd9: @jaketapper When I think 'populist' - Orange County in number one on MY list!

phd9: @jaketapper re: Confidence. Look on the bright side. He didn't say he's doing a heck of a job.....

phd9: @jaketapper The AIG bonuses were "contractual" obligations. Yet the Big 3's UAW contracts were abrogated. Why not AIG's?

phd9: @jaketapper I know chasing earmarks are fun - BUT!http://mediamatters.org/items/200903130027?f=h_column

phd9: @jaketapper Two thoughts re partisanship 1. Never underestimate the power of selective attention. 2. How did we get to this point?

4 comments:

Jay Ackroyd (@jayackroyd) said...

Congratulations. Badge of honor to you, you dirty fucking hippie.

Unknown said...

But if the threshold if so low, is being blocked by Tapper really an honor? Congrats, anyway.

stuart_zechman said...

This is serious, folks.

This tool is bringing his cocktail-party invitation sensibilities to a technology that isn't about controlling access.

If this guy gets away with this, we're looking at JournoList 2.0.

Jay Ackroyd (@jayackroyd) said...

What'[s the problem with journolist, Stuart?