Military power is good for blowing things up; it's good for destroying things. It's not good for building a new order. It takes a great deal more power, skill, and patience to construct an enduring order in Iraq.
Link
I've always said when your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. When your only tool is a bomb everything looks like a target.
Monday, February 27, 2006
Friday, February 24, 2006
Matthew Yglesias pisses me off.
Fundamentally, if invading Iraq had proven to be a good idea I doubt there would be all that much concern about the president's honesty. The basic problem is that the war wasn't a good idea. The lying is sort of icing on the cake
And this guy's supposed to be on my team.
War is NEVER a good idea. Even if it might ever be necessary it is NEVER a "good idea". And the lying is The WHOLE EFFING PROBLEM!
link
And this guy's supposed to be on my team.
War is NEVER a good idea. Even if it might ever be necessary it is NEVER a "good idea". And the lying is The WHOLE EFFING PROBLEM!
link
Monday, February 20, 2006
George W. Bush 3% - I know I'm impressed!
Happy Presidents' Day!
Who do you think was the greatest U.S. president that served in the last 30 years?
Jimmy Carter 6% => 588 votes
Ronald Reagan 47% => 4614 votes
George H.W. Bush 1% => 112 votes
Bill Clinton 23% => 2269 votes
George W. Bush 3% => 373 votes
None of them were great 17% => 1737 votes
I'm not sure 1% => 105 votes
Current number of voters: 9798
Who do you think was the greatest U.S. president that served in the last 30 years?
Jimmy Carter 6% => 588 votes
Ronald Reagan 47% => 4614 votes
George H.W. Bush 1% => 112 votes
Bill Clinton 23% => 2269 votes
George W. Bush 3% => 373 votes
None of them were great 17% => 1737 votes
I'm not sure 1% => 105 votes
Current number of voters: 9798
Friday, February 17, 2006
I comment at Glenn Greenwald
The framers of the constitution understood the corrupting influence of power and did everything they could to guard against it. It doesn't matter whose "team" you're on. Can you imagine the howling that would be going on if it were Janet Reno who was claiming the right to wiretap without oversight?
(Actually we don't need to imagine it, we can remember it.) Anyone remember the "clipper chip"?
This battle is of crucial impoortance because whatever the result, it will affect the stucture of power in this country for decades to come.
Link
(Actually we don't need to imagine it, we can remember it.) Anyone remember the "clipper chip"?
This battle is of crucial impoortance because whatever the result, it will affect the stucture of power in this country for decades to come.
Link
Monday, February 13, 2006
Posted without comment
Generally speaking, do you approve, disapprove, or have mixed feelings about the way President George W. Bush is handling his job? (Related AP article)
Strongly approve 23% => 2382 votes
Somewhat approve 14% => 1512 votes
Have mixed feelings 9% => 929 votes
Somewhat disapprove 5% => 550 votes
Strongly disapprove 47% => 4922 votes
I'm not sure 0% => 17 votes
Current number of voters: 10312
Strongly approve 23% => 2382 votes
Somewhat approve 14% => 1512 votes
Have mixed feelings 9% => 929 votes
Somewhat disapprove 5% => 550 votes
Strongly disapprove 47% => 4922 votes
I'm not sure 0% => 17 votes
Current number of voters: 10312
Thursday, February 09, 2006
A comment I posted on Glenn Greenwald's site.
Too many people it seems have forgotten the lessons of Kent State and the 68 democratic convention. Violent action against citizens over their politics is a real possibility, if we can't maintain the rule of law.
Quoting from your post yesterday "the Administration has now baldly stated that whatever it is allowed to do against our enemies in a war, it is equally entitled to exercise all of the same powers against American citizens on American soil."
So what happens when the eavesdropping program discovers someone who's a really bad guy but they can't prosecute him because they've tainted the evidence?
We already know what they do if he happens to be in Pakistan.
Quoting from your post yesterday "the Administration has now baldly stated that whatever it is allowed to do against our enemies in a war, it is equally entitled to exercise all of the same powers against American citizens on American soil."
So what happens when the eavesdropping program discovers someone who's a really bad guy but they can't prosecute him because they've tainted the evidence?
We already know what they do if he happens to be in Pakistan.
I am occasionally encouraged that people are starting to get it.
What do you think should be the single most important priority in the federal budget?
Extending tax cuts 9% => 348 votes
Fighting the war on terrorism 18% => 674 votes
Medicare 7% => 265 votes
Reconstructing the Gulf Coast region 4% => 159 votes
Reducing domestic spending 4% => 170 votes
Reducing the federal deficit 23% => 856 votes
Social Security 9% => 354 votes
Stimulating job growth 11% => 403 votes
None of the above 7% => 250 votes
I'm not sure 2% => 92 votes
Current number of voters: 3571
Extending tax cuts 9% => 348 votes
Fighting the war on terrorism 18% => 674 votes
Medicare 7% => 265 votes
Reconstructing the Gulf Coast region 4% => 159 votes
Reducing domestic spending 4% => 170 votes
Reducing the federal deficit 23% => 856 votes
Social Security 9% => 354 votes
Stimulating job growth 11% => 403 votes
None of the above 7% => 250 votes
I'm not sure 2% => 92 votes
Current number of voters: 3571
Wednesday, February 08, 2006
From Glenn Greenwald
In case anyone wonders why I think this stuff is scary....
"Put another way, the Administration has now baldly stated that whatever it is allowed to do against our enemies in a war, it is equally entitled to exercise all of the same powers against American citizens on American soil. "
Link
"Put another way, the Administration has now baldly stated that whatever it is allowed to do against our enemies in a war, it is equally entitled to exercise all of the same powers against American citizens on American soil. "
Link
Tuesday, February 07, 2006
From read JDM
I understand that our soldiers are making sacrifices. But I don’t really feel like my freedoms are on the line in Iraq at the moment. Maybe they are. But if so, I’m more concerned with how they got over there in the first place. I mean, they’re my freedoms, aren’t they? Shouldn’t they be over here with the rest of my things? I’m going to need some answers to those questions if “Defending Our Freedom” is going to work as a pro-war argument for me.
Full article here
Full article here
Wednesday, February 01, 2006
From the Washington Post
Police escorted Sheehan from the visitors' gallery above the House chamber after causing a disruption, said a Capitol Police official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because details of the incident were sketchy. he was lying.
link
link
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)